This isn't too surprising however since it was down fairly significantly last October, dropping 7.3% compared to October 2010. Ridership will be going up for sometime simply because of large drops that last year sustained from track work.
Ridership
Surfliner +6.9%
Starlight +9.7%
Capitol Corridor -0.3%
San Joaquin +12.6%
Nationally +0.4%
Metrolink +13.8%
COASTER +10.1%
Ridership declines in September and increases in October for Metrolink and COASTER are partially explained by two fewer weekdays in September but two extra weekdays in October.
Revenue
Surfliner +13.5%
Starlight +8.1%
Capitol Corridor +5.2%
San Joaquin +7.0%
Nationally +3.4%
Surfliner OTP remained above 80% for the second month in a row, averaging 82.5% overall; 92.3% for LOSSAN North and 84.3% for LOSSAN South. This still has a large room for improvement to meet with Metrolink and COASTER OTP even without taking into consideration the stricter metrics for commuter on time performance.
Friday, November 30, 2012
Saturday, November 17, 2012
NJT parked equipment in areas forecast to flood
A third of its locomotives and a quarter of its rail cars lost to flood damage as a result.
Hundreds of millions of dollars in damage, massive harm to post-hurricane recovery, and quite possibly billions of dollars in total economic damages, all because a handful of utter fools couldn't pay the proper attention to their jobs and ensure that the equipment was moved to somewhere that was not a predicted flood zone. I am hoping that it was merely a lack of consideration for the hurricane that led to this and not active incompetence that moved equipment from safer areas to these lower lying areas. Words completely fail me in that latter scenario.
Hundreds of millions of dollars in damage, massive harm to post-hurricane recovery, and quite possibly billions of dollars in total economic damages, all because a handful of utter fools couldn't pay the proper attention to their jobs and ensure that the equipment was moved to somewhere that was not a predicted flood zone. I am hoping that it was merely a lack of consideration for the hurricane that led to this and not active incompetence that moved equipment from safer areas to these lower lying areas. Words completely fail me in that latter scenario.
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Argentina tunnels rail line with history of deadly accidents
This is somewhat older news, but still interesting. It's the same line that had a horrible collision earlier in the year killing 51 people.
There are a couple of standout points to me:
1. It is surprisingly cost-effective as a means of grade separation. The 52 grade crossings for vehicular traffic would, in America, typically cost somewhere around $70 million each, and an additional several million for each pedestrian crossing. Even then, this would not entirely prevent pedestrian strikes or vehicles interfering with train traffic, though admittedly, it likely doesn't matter statistically. Of course, American tunneling costs are also quite a bit higher. I suspect that much of the cost with this project is due to relocating the fifteen stations underground, though building the tunnels large enough to accommodate bilevel trains undoubtedly plays its own part in it.
2. There is an absolutely tremendous amount of traffic on that line. If I'm not mistaken, the ten million passengers per month on that lone 35km line is three times the number of passengers on all California commuter rail lines combined.
3. This also appears to be part of an upgrade for the line in question, renewing its electrification and signaling systems. Currently it appears to be using electric locomotive hauled single level equipment, which heaps even more shame on California's commuter lines. Since the equipment on the line will be sixty years old by the time the tunnels are completed, and aging equipment has been blamed for the earlier collision, I don't think that the double deck height of the tunnel is simply future-proofing: I would be highly surprised were there not to be a double deck EMU contract timed with the new tunnel openings.
There are a couple of standout points to me:
1. It is surprisingly cost-effective as a means of grade separation. The 52 grade crossings for vehicular traffic would, in America, typically cost somewhere around $70 million each, and an additional several million for each pedestrian crossing. Even then, this would not entirely prevent pedestrian strikes or vehicles interfering with train traffic, though admittedly, it likely doesn't matter statistically. Of course, American tunneling costs are also quite a bit higher. I suspect that much of the cost with this project is due to relocating the fifteen stations underground, though building the tunnels large enough to accommodate bilevel trains undoubtedly plays its own part in it.
2. There is an absolutely tremendous amount of traffic on that line. If I'm not mistaken, the ten million passengers per month on that lone 35km line is three times the number of passengers on all California commuter rail lines combined.
3. This also appears to be part of an upgrade for the line in question, renewing its electrification and signaling systems. Currently it appears to be using electric locomotive hauled single level equipment, which heaps even more shame on California's commuter lines. Since the equipment on the line will be sixty years old by the time the tunnels are completed, and aging equipment has been blamed for the earlier collision, I don't think that the double deck height of the tunnel is simply future-proofing: I would be highly surprised were there not to be a double deck EMU contract timed with the new tunnel openings.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Amtrak California stations by average boarding per train
Put this together to see if there might be any relationships that could be gleaned, but to be honest, I'm not seeing one. Still, I'll put it out there in case someone else finds one or otherwise finds it useful. The employed population is taken from those living within 5 miles of the station according to On The Map and station boardings are 2011 data. Because of their close proximity, I merged San Diego Santa Fe and San Diego Old Town Stations together. I strongly suspect that bus boardings are included, which would mean an extra 100-200,000 boardings at Los Angeles and Bakersfield, severely inflating the data for Bakersfield in particular. Each "train per day" is for trains taking passengers on; intermediate stations will have double the train numbers of termini as a result.
Boardings
|
Employed population within 5 miles
|
Trains per day
|
Boardings per train
|
Boardings per Kiloperson per daily train
|
|
Los Angeles
|
1,606,121
|
370,097
|
18.4
|
239.8
|
235.9
|
Bakersfield
|
476,767
|
106,671
|
6
|
218.3
|
744.9
|
San Diego (including Old Town)
|
776,606
|
168,939
|
11
|
194.0
|
417.9
|
Sacramento
|
1,175,046
|
116,849
|
35.1
|
92.0
|
286.5
|
Stockton (San Joaquin Street)
|
260,115
|
82,499
|
8
|
89.3
|
394.1
|
Fresno
|
371,875
|
94,650
|
12
|
85.1
|
327.4
|
Irvine
|
664,263
|
107,151
|
22
|
82.9
|
281.8
|
Auburn
|
29,438
|
17,683
|
1
|
80.9
|
1,664.8
|
Santa Barbara
|
317,617
|
43,789
|
12
|
72.7
|
604.4
|
San Luis Obispo
|
101,659
|
19,583
|
4
|
69.8
|
1,297.8
|
San Jose
|
224,756
|
255,472
|
9
|
68.6
|
97.8
|
Solana Beach
|
443,386
|
49,143
|
22
|
55.4
|
410.1
|
Fullerton
|
436,383
|
267,607
|
22.3
|
53.8
|
73.1
|
Rocklin
|
36,329
|
63,645
|
2
|
49.9
|
285.4
|
Roseville
|
67,831
|
110,139
|
4
|
46.6
|
154.0
|
Hanford
|
199,291
|
22,109
|
12
|
45.6
|
751.2
|
Anaheim
|
352,363
|
283,712
|
22
|
44.0
|
56.5
|
Emeryville
|
583,865
|
157,765
|
40.1
|
40.0
|
92.3
|
Oceanside
|
311,834
|
48,465
|
22
|
38.9
|
292.5
|
Davis
|
443,168
|
27,403
|
33.1
|
36.8
|
488.6
|
Martinez
|
446,507
|
37,159
|
37.1
|
33.1
|
323.9
|
Oakland
|
379,851
|
178,608
|
35.1
|
29.7
|
60.6
|
San Juan Capistrano
|
230,481
|
73,265
|
21.3
|
29.7
|
147.7
|
Stockton (Downtown)
|
38,401
|
82,499
|
4
|
26.4
|
116.4
|
Merced
|
114,401
|
31,098
|
12
|
26.2
|
306.6
|
Salinas
|
18,164
|
55,674
|
2
|
25.0
|
163.1
|
Goleta
|
62,310
|
30,520
|
7
|
24.5
|
291.7
|
Modesto
|
104,647
|
56,166
|
12
|
24.0
|
155.3
|
Santa Clara
|
115,989
|
193,309
|
14
|
22.8
|
42.9
|
Santa Ana
|
170,036
|
249,126
|
21.3
|
21.9
|
32.0
|
Richmond
|
276,114
|
83,814
|
37.1
|
20.4
|
88.8
|
Suisun-Fairfield
|
192,471
|
45,403
|
29.1
|
18.2
|
145.7
|
Oxnard
|
78,085
|
93,732
|
12
|
17.9
|
69.4
|
Van Nuys
|
74,163
|
293,333
|
12
|
17.0
|
21.1
|
Palm Springs
|
5,897
|
14,210
|
1
|
16.2
|
415.0
|
Riverside
|
11,679
|
87,180
|
2
|
16.0
|
67.0
|
Redding
|
11,440
|
30,425
|
2
|
15.7
|
188.0
|
Ontario
|
5,422
|
158,687
|
1
|
14.9
|
34.2
|
San Bernardino
|
10,552
|
117,288
|
2
|
14.5
|
45.0
|
Paso Robles
|
10,122
|
14,064
|
2
|
13.9
|
359.9
|
Chico
|
9,843
|
34,856
|
2
|
13.5
|
141.2
|
Berkeley
|
142,510
|
130,561
|
29.1
|
13.5
|
37.5
|
Ventura
|
47,457
|
27,055
|
10
|
13.0
|
175.4
|
Needles
|
8,840
|
3,342
|
2
|
12.1
|
1,322.6
|
Chatsworth
|
52,401
|
131,991
|
12
|
12.0
|
33.1
|
Antioch-Pittsburg
|
34,794
|
60,184
|
8
|
11.9
|
72.3
|
Grover Beach
|
17,326
|
20,184
|
4
|
11.9
|
214.6
|
Truckee
|
8,399
|
6,969
|
2
|
11.5
|
602.6
|
Camarillo
|
36,686
|
36,637
|
9
|
11.2
|
111.3
|
Burbank
|
47,928
|
228,767
|
12
|
11.0
|
17.5
|
Glendale
|
39,913
|
328,643
|
10
|
11.0
|
12.1
|
Simi Valley
|
41,136
|
56,223
|
12
|
9.4
|
61.0
|
Victorville
|
6,488
|
31,768
|
2
|
8.9
|
102.1
|
Fremont
|
43,515
|
137,854
|
14
|
8.5
|
22.5
|
Dunsmuir
|
5,370
|
960
|
2
|
7.4
|
2,796.9
|
Guadalupe
|
10,649
|
2,902
|
4
|
7.3
|
917.4
|
Moorpark
|
13,191
|
32,966
|
5
|
7.2
|
80.0
|
San Clemente Pier
|
9,223
|
25,049
|
4
|
6.3
|
92.0
|
Corcoran
|
27,424
|
5,142
|
12
|
6.3
|
444.4
|
Hayward
|
30,603
|
140,809
|
14
|
6.0
|
15.5
|
Colfax
|
4,036
|
3,962
|
2
|
5.5
|
509.3
|
Carpinteria
|
20,064
|
8,244
|
10
|
5.5
|
243.4
|
Turlock-Denair
|
23,454
|
29,031
|
12
|
5.4
|
67.3
|
Barstow
|
3,870
|
12,058
|
2
|
5.3
|
160.5
|
Lodi
|
7,422
|
29,362
|
4
|
5.1
|
63.2
|
Madera
|
21,739
|
22,749
|
12
|
5.0
|
79.6
|
Wasco
|
18,209
|
6,678
|
12
|
4.2
|
227.2
|
Pomona
|
1,517
|
148,017
|
1
|
4.2
|
10.2
|
Orange
|
3,025
|
257,287
|
2
|
4.2
|
5.9
|
Lompoc-Surf
|
5,950
|
186
|
4
|
4.1
|
7,997.3
|
Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo
|
2,938
|
114,909
|
2
|
4.0
|
12.8
|
Oakland Coliseum
|
22,113
|
157,390
|
17.9
|
3.4
|
7.8
|